Cops, Cake & Calochortus: Mother’s Day on “Parcel B”

DSC01196

The little apples: How manzanita got its name.  Woollyleaf Manzanita (Arctostaphylos tomentosa) grows along the side of the “Parcel B” trail.

The Right to Hike folks, who’ve been working to maintain public access to the trail connecting Veterans and Quarry Parks in Monterey, have been in a mood to celebrate since the recent court decision confirming the public’s right to use the trail and the surrounding “Parcel B” for recreational purposes. So today the Right to Hikers held their second annual Mother’s Day walk on the trail, followed by a barbeque at Veteran’s Park.

Last year, opponents of public access tried to spoil the party by going to court and asking for an order blocking the hike – which the court, unsurprisingly, refused to grant. The court apparently didn’t agree that a walk in the woods and picnic by a few dozen law-abiding locals (with an average age well over 50) needed to be stopped in the interest of preventing violence. And the court was right. The event went off without a hitch and a good time was had by all.

Apparently realizing the futility of trying to block the event through legal channels, at least one individual embarked on a new and still more deranged effort to derail this year’s celebration. They began by posting notices along the trail and in the park stating that the event had been cancelled and followed that up by distributing fliers to the homeless inviting them to the party and promising them free food.

This didn’t work out any better than last year’s legal action. The walk and barbeque were, once again, an unqualified success. No one appears to have been fooled by the “event cancelled” signs and the two homeless men who showed up were warmly welcomed and ended up having a great time along with everyone else (although they were a bit irritated and embarrassed about being “played by an idiot”).

Even the sad antics of an emotionally unbalanced access opponent who showed up and made an embarrassing spectacle of herself couldn’t put a damper on the festivities. She arrived with the party in full swing and began wandering around taking pictures of everyone while denouncing them as “lowlifes,” accusing them of illegal parking, and bragging about how her house was the “best in the neighborhood.” The police soon arrived (four cars worth!) and, rather than citing anyone for illegal parking, “counseled” the woman to leave.

But enough of tawdry human melodrama. What is it that makes “Parcel B” so special in the first place?

Well, besides the view, its relatively intact native pine forest makes it a great place, right in town, to have a look at the wildflowers. Here’s some of what the Mother’s Day walkers saw today:

DSC01194

Blue Dicks (Dichelostemma capitatum)

DSC01198

Windmill Pinks (Silene gallica) and Rattlesnake Grass (Briza maxima)

DSC01201

Hooker’s Manzanita (Arctostaphylos hookeri); an official endangered species.

DSC01205

Fairy Lanterns (Calochortus albus)

DSC01207

Cobweb Thistle (Cirsium occidentale) preparing to bloom.

DSC01211

California Wood Fern (Dryopteris arguta)

DSC01214

Sticky Monkey-Flower (Mimulus aurantiacus)

DSC01216

Hairy Honey Suckle (Lonicera hispidula) about to bloom.

DSC01221

A late blooming Douglas Iris (Iris douglasiana)

DSC01228

Checkerbloom (Sidalcea malvaeflora); one of the Monterey Peninsula’s signature wildflowers.

DSC01226

A California Buttercup (Ranunculus californicus)

DSC01202

Blue-Eyed Grass (Sisyrinchium bellum)

Advertisements

One Response to Cops, Cake & Calochortus: Mother’s Day on “Parcel B”

  1. Cathy Giammanco says:

    My name is Cathy Giammanco. As my name has been slandered enough by your group, I can assure you I did not attend your Mother Day event, nor have I spoken to but a few over you over the past 9 years, and then, only in an effort to inform you that we 17 homeowners, the OWNERS OF PARCEL B, are have paid $140,000 for the maintenance and liability insurance of the property while the public used it. Hardly fair or Constitutional. That is the extent of my interaction with you group, although apparently the word is that I am the person you write about as attending your event. I am not. And the only reason we tried to prevent the march across our property is because of the increased liability…supposed 500 people attended the march…the homeowners are liable for accidents and insurance. Why can’t you understand that?

    Your name has never been mentioned, let alone slandered, in any post on this site… and we are not part of any “group.” We do not know you, have not met you, and, if it were not for the comments you’ve posted on this site, our readers would likely have remained ignorant of your very existence. We did not state or imply in any way that you were the person whose sad antics are described in this post and, although that person’s identity is certainly no secret, we see no need to add to their embarrassment by printing their name. And we’ll ask once again: Couldn’t you have avoided all that maintenance expense and potential liability by simply letting your homeowners association transfer ownership of the property to the city? According to the press, the homeowners association voted to do that years ago, but you and a few others opposed the transfer and filed suit to stop it. Is this not correct?– XT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: